 |
| Metro train Washington D.C. citylab.com |
Why do some people insist on ruining perfectly beautiful architecture? The reason why yours truly is asking is Washington D.C. metro rail stations are home to some of the spectacular examples of Brutalist architecture. Regardless of what you may think of the genre, there is a certain appeal to it. So why would anyone want to cover it up? This is subject Kriston Capps ponders in his CityLab article "Keep Metro Bleak!" The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority seems to think that the soaring coffered vaulted ceilings need covering up. This stunned Bill Gallagher, principal for KGP design studio. Shall we find out why WMATA wants to paint the vaults gleaming white?
 |
| Two metro rail cars decouple from a train during rush hour Washington DC washingtontimes.com |
Today, Mr. Gallagher is still designing Metro stations: "His firm's work includes canopies, elevators, and entrances for at least a dozen stations." Thus, his views about the system are well earned and strong. When he heard that workers were painting Union Station's signature exposed concrete vaulted ceiling-he was incensed. He told Mr. Capps,
It was just unbelievable...Absolutely shocking.
 |
| Close up detail of Metro rail coffered ceiling Washington D.C. ggwash.org |
Mr. Moeller declared,
But not white...I'm sort of hoping against hope that ti's maybe a primer...White would be a radical change...
Okay, it is just paint, right? Well, that paint took the WMATA in-house design team by surprise. Left out of the decision process to paint the Brutalist vaults white were Metro's chief architect Ivalio Karadimov or chief architectural historian Jeff Winstel. Messrs. Karadimov and Winstel were not even aware it was happening, an anonymous source, not authorized by WMATA, told Mr. Capps. In an aside Mr. Capps writes, "A spokesperson there could not confirm or deny the claim.
 |
| Union Station vault Washington D.C. redbubble.com |
In WMATA's defense, the soaring arched wall of Union Station, the busiest station in the system, were "grim, grimy, and bleak. WMATA's solution: several layers of white paint..." WMATA spokesperson Dan Stessel said via email,
While power washing was considered, years of dust, dirt, and grime coating the vault cannot effectively be cleaned and does little to move the needle when it comes to brightness.
The shiny finish may not last. According to Mr. Gallagher, "Metro's vaults were not designed to be painted,...and WMATA management made a mistake by not consulting the experts first. Raw concrete is a more forgiving surface;...it disguises wear and tear." So you can imagine that painting the ceiling in pristine white may look fabulous at first, "but will only highlight the fresh grime as it accumulates." Bill Gallagher warned,
Especially this station. It's going to be filthy within weeks.
 |
| The Main Hall at Union Station Washington D.C. railway-technology.com |
Robert Bruegmann, the author of The Architect of Harry Weese, told Kriston Capps, "It's all too common for institutions to come to think of their design features as flaws." Harry Weese passed away in 1998, "long enough for many at WMATA to have forgotten him." Elite opinion has been kind to the late Mr. Weese: "The American Institute of Architects granted Metro its prestigious 25-Year Award in 2014." In an update dated March 31: The Washington D.C. chapter of the AIA issued a letter,
...expressing our deep concern regarding WMATA's decision to paint the interior of the Metro Stations [sic] bright white.
significant alterations to Metro stations in Washington D.C.
 |
| The barrel vaults at Union Station Washington D.C. pinterest.com |
It is very easy to miss some of the more elegant details. Mr. Capps writes, "Deep coffers that run between the ribs of the vaults-the coffers are structural, not decorative components-are mirrorred by the shape of the windows on the older-styles Metrorail trains."
Popular opinion has not been kind for a variety of reasons including top-down neglect.
Rather than rehabilitate Harry Weese's designs, something that WMATA attempted and failed at before, the agency could have simply power cleaned Union Station. It is already modernizing the lighting with technology not available in the sixties when Mr. Weese's (and lighting designer William Lam) first drew up plans for the stations. According to Mr. Gallagher, "Simply 'relamping' its Metro station...WMATA can brighten murky platforms, bring down costs, and expand the maintenance window for lighting from every 2 years to every decade. (That would be be a better use of the agency's energy,...)"
Bill Gallagher continued, "Exposed concrete was key to the kit of parts that Weese designed for Metro. He use a limited palette of durable yet warm materials." Among the palette of material was quarry tile, granite, bronze, and brown paint (good for concealing rust on trains). There are no columns so passengers can see their path of travel. Indirect lighting allows people to always see faces around them. Not every one of Harry Weese's concepts were so flawless. "The bronze elevators were dark and confining. (Gallagher's firm replaced the one at the Rosslyn Metro Station with a more inviting glass elevator)." The outsized kiosks are a forbidding obstacle that separate the station operators from the passengers. For the all the flaws, Metro's warmth and soaring vaults are probably one the few good things about Washington D.C. right now.
 |
| The Grand Central Interior of Union Station Washington D.C. thousandwonders.net |
Harry Weese was a very fine architect, and he did quite a few buildings, many of them interesting and whimsical...Ironically, it was when he did the Metro, where he had the weight of all these commissions and bureaucracies to deal with, that he somehow managed, along with everyone else involved, to create this system.
It is easy for commuters not to pay attention to the remarkable visual achievement of the Metro. Especially when it is busy or they are trapped at the Rosslyn Station, waiting to be packed into a train car like sardines, or cursing all the way to or from a sports event. However, if you happened to attend a local photography exhibition, try to find an image that does not included a blurry train against the backdrop of one of Harry Weese's majestic structural vault. You will not.
WMATA can ill-afford to take Metro for granted. The agency has more pressing concerns on its plate than cosmetic repair; allowing for aesthetic concerns, WMATA seems to have powered ahead without consulting with designers. This impulsiveness has blown up in WMATA's face over the years. Strangely, WMATA thinks it found a problem where there was not one, Harry Weese's design.
No comments:
Post a Comment