|Patent application for "the multiple telegraph"|
Alexander Graham-Bell (born in Scotland)
Library of Congress
Welcome to the new week and newish subject to chat about. Today we are going back to the topic of immigration. In this case, how immigration impacts innovation. Some our greatest innovators have been, at one point, immigrants, like Scottish-born Alexander Graham Bell, the inventor of the telephone. Now imagine, an modern day Alexander Graham Bell, trying to enter the United States following President Donald Trump's executive orders and promised crack down on immigration. You could argue that "he is from Scotland and therefore, not subject to immigration restrictions." However, if POTUS manages to get his immigration legislation passed and signed into law, it is possible that even a Scottish-born, highly skilled immigrant like Alexander Graham Bell could be shut out of the United States. How can this be possible? Read on.
Tanvi Misra points out in her CityLab article, " How Immigrants Changed the Geography of Innovation," "...his immigration and refugee ban, leaked draft orders, and the language of his top aides all suggest that he's looking to go further, restricting the legal immigration of 'high-skilled' workers." Thus, an immigrant Alexander Graham Bell would not be able to enter the United States, regardless if he or she is able make a positive contribution to the nation. Even more potentially damaging is a possible restriction of highly skilled immigrants would compromise America's ability to innovate, limiting the country's technological advantage and economic growth.
|Percentage of Foreign- and Native-Born workers in occupation|
|"The Geography of Immigrant Skills"|
You've got these anecdotes like Alexander Graham Bell that give you an image of what immigrant inventors were like, but hopefully, the beauty of this paper is that we're going way beyond those anecdotes.
Tanvi Misra writes, "The paper first illuminates how immigrants influence the geography of inventiveness." For example, states like New York andI Illinois had the highest per capita patents during the study period, "around 20 percent of the population was foreign-born." In states with the least per capita patents, immigrants make up "2 percent of the population." This statistic is particularly significant because regions and technology hubs with higher patents experience more economic growth, according to a previous analysis by the co-authors. There are two reasons for this phenomena. Prof. Nicholas continued, One explanation is that immigrant inventors concentrate in...Independently, they fill gaps in knowledge.
In essence, immigrants with great ideas tend to congregate in places and occupations where their ideas are welcome. Further, "when many of them work together, they influence each, compounding the ingenuity in their own field and others," according to Prof. Nicholas. Independently, they fill gaps in knowledge.
|Inventors per 10,000 people, 1880-1940|
The map on the left-hand side diagrams concentration of foreign-born inventors according to states. The Northeastern states (dark orange) show a high number of immigrants contributing to American innovation. The Southern states (pale yellow) have the lowest concentration of foreign-born innovators. The co-authors write,
...perhaps because such places were less likely to be open to disruptive ideas and intolerant of social change.
Thus, it is no big surprise that cities with the greatest number of patents: San Jose, Houston, New York, Chicago have a greater share of immigrants populations.
|Immigrant skill and innovation|
Further, on average, immigrant inventors were more productive, "with 9 percent more patents through their careers than their native-born counterparts." Despite the higher level of productivity, immigrant inventors were "paid 5 percent less." Ms. Misra concludes, "The mismatch between wages and relative productivity suggests labor market discrimination." Fair conclusion.
The irony in all this is President Trump campaigned on the promise of "Make America Great Again," is doing precisely the opposite. Then-candidate Trump based his campaign on economic anxiety, promising to return the United States to a high level of competitiveness, yet wants to severely limit immigration. The Rise of American Ingenuity: Innovation and Inventors of the Golden Age (http://www.nber.org) by University of Chicago economists Ufuk Akcigit and John Grigsby with Harvard economist Tom Nicholas bolsters the case that tech companies, like Apple and Microsoft, are making against a legislative agenda that potentially threatens the future of American innovation. Ms. Misra speculates, "With fewer immigrants, Silicon Valley may no longer be able to maintain its primacy as a global tech hub." Should the unthinkable happen and legal immigration is severely restricted, the more welcoming Vancouver, Canada will be in optimal place to open up to global talent.