Monday, August 18, 2014

Saving Sites of African American Cultural History

http://soultrain.com/2014/08/07/wsouleo-31/



Hinchliffe Stadium
Paterson, New Jersey
blog.preservationnation.org

Hello Everyone:

After spending sometime over the weekend cheering myself up after writing two obituaries in a row last week, yours truly is rested and ready to go.

Today we're going to look at "The Politics of Preserving African American Historic Sites."  This article comes from On the A w/Souleo, a weekly arts, culture and philanthropy in Harlem column, written by Souleo the founder and president of events/media production company Souleo Enterprises LLC.  This article looks at the efforts of Brent Leggs, senior field officier of the National Trust for Historic Preservation to return sites of African American to their former glory.  The post does offer a brief outline of some of the issues surrounding the preservation of African American cultural history but any real in-depth analysis.  Despite this brief overview, it is important to note that some of these places are located in or near urban centers undergoing transformation.  I say this is important because as our urban centers expand into regional centers, lesser known historic and cultural sites will come under threat unless there is an action plan in place.

Joe Frazier's Gym
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
nytimes.com
Currently, places like Hinchliffe Stadium in Paterson, New Jersey are suffering from deterioration and vandalism.  However, if Mr. Leggs has his way, Hinchliffe Stadium and others places will find new lives.  One example is the Philadelphia gymnasium where boxing legend Joe Frazier once trained is now a discount furniture store. Villa Lewaro, the former home of Madame C.J. Walker the first self-made million, stands vulnerable to destruction.  Hinchliffe Stadium, once a site of Negro League baseball is also a target for destruction.

For Mr. Leggs, it is obvious that these are significant places of African American cultural history.  He is also aware that it will take some convincing of the general public to understand why these sites should be saved. This is particularly true for less important places which have gone unrecognized or no longer in use to their communities, where they often end up abandoned. "We are constantly asking what is the higher purpose for what we do?  How can preservation help to improve conditions in a blighted and predominantly diverse community?  We know that our responsibility is not just to save buildings but also to save lives...These sites should be anchors with a social justice component that addresses contemporary issues."  To this end, Mr. Leggs envisions a cultural and educational center for Joe Frazier's gym that also pays tribute to the boxer's legacy in the local community.  Mr. Leggs also envisions a center that could include a health and wellness component.

Villa Lewaro
Irvington, New York
en.wikipedia.org
One of the hinderances to preserving sites of African American culture is the dreaded g-word: gentrification.  In cities across the United States, gentrification is a controversial issue with one of its most intensely argued subjects being the demolition of historic sites and replacing them with more lucrative luxury condominium developments. According to Mr. Leggs, the razing of less publicized sites could be avoided by educating developers on the value of historic preservation and the tax incentives available to them.  Brent Leggs stated, "Many sites of diversity are places that, on the outside, don't appear to hold historical significance.  Thus, developers and investors that come in can easily consider the demolition of these historic places because they don't understand the value.  The thing is making sure we have identified places worth of being preserved."

The home of John Coltrane
Dix Hills, Huntington, Suffolk County, New York
preservationnation.org
Getting sites of diversity recognized usually involves having them listed on local, state, or the National Register of Historic Places.  Once these sites are designated landmark, they can qualify for federal tax credits that can be applied toward rehabilitation construction costs.  This can be a good incentive in getting developers and investors to preserve historic sites.  More than getting a historic site landmarked, Mr. Leggs advocates that sites become financially secure by developing a strong business model. According to Mr. Leggs, "The real challenge has been in the proper preservation planning to identify financially sustainable redevelopment strategies.  With the big issue being funding we have to create a new paradigm to have sites consider being a for-profit business and think about financial sustainability."

At the moment, Brent Leggs is working with a team to to create plans for Villa Lewaro.  The team's goal is generating ideas that will consider the revenue potential and establish the estate as a cultural attraction, not just a house museum.  To aid this goal, Toyota recently presented the National Trust with $10,000 at the 2014 National Association of Black Journalists Convention and Career Fair in Boston. Choice of location for this year's NABJ was a deliberate one as the organization wants to attract more media awareness for greater support and ultimately more funding.

In 2011, the NABJ received an anonymous $50,000 donation and pro bono architectural services to protect the Dix Hills, New York home of jazz great (and personal favorite) John Coltrane.  Mr. Leggs credits this sizable donation to media interests that stemmed from the home's inclusion on the annual "America's 11 Most Endangered Historic Places list.  "The media has been an effective tool to reach the audience.  Once people are aware of the issue they generally take action to support our efforts."




Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Untangling More Historic Preservation Jargon

Lauren Bacall
doctormarco.com

Hello Everyone:

Another day, another memorial.  So sad.  Before I get started on explaining more preservation jargon, I would like to offer a few thoughts on the passing of Lauren Bacall.  Lauren Bacall was no mere actor, she was a presence on screen.  The famous husky voice of hers insinuated a sense mystery that pulled you toward her.  Ms. Bacall was the epitome of style, grace, and class, qualities sorely lacking in the current crop of male and female actors.  These qualities were no mere affectations, they came naturally.  If that weren't enough, Ms. Bacall proved that she was equally at home in the classic noir films of the forties and comedy.  Etched into our collective cultural conscious is that famous scene from her debut film To Have and Have Not.  Hers was no mere walk on role, she starred opposite no less than Humphrey Bogart, a major star in his own right, in a movie based on the story Ernest Hemingway and adapted for the screen by William Faulkner, and directed by Howard Hawks.  An ordinary actor would have surely wilted but not Ms. Bacall.  It was that scene between her and her soon-to-husband Mr. Bogart that captured the audience's attention.  We all know it:

You don't have to act with me Steve.  You don't have to say anything and you don't have to do anything.  Not a thing.  Oh, maybe just whistle.  [Pause]  You know how to whistle, don't you Steve?  You put your two lips together and blow.

You can just feel the sexual tension.  The role of Vivian Sternwood in the screen adaptation of Raymond Chandler's debut novel The Big Sleep, had Lauren Bacall written all over it.  By the time it was made both Ms. Bacall and Mr. Bogart were married, yet you can just feel the chemistry between them about to explode.  That kind of allure is a rare commodity in contemporary Hollywood.  Most of the time, it just feels so manufactured and endlessly replicated.  I'd like to end it here with a line from the movie Casablanca.  Even though Lauren Bacall wasn't in it, I think it's quite appropriate, "Here's looking at you."  Goodbye Lauren Bacall.

http://blog.preservationnation.org/2014/preservation-tips-tools-preservation-jargon-part-two/#.U6C_oldVYx



Durham Market Place
Durham, North Carolina
durham-nc.com
Hello Again:

Given the heaviness of the preambles of this and yesterday's posts, I thought I might lighten the mood a little with another round of preservation jargon.  Specifically, with the help of Cassie Keener, an Editorial Intern at the National Trust for Historic Preservation, I would like to help you navigate your way through some of the mind boggling acronyms, organizations, and federal laws that compose preservation's lexicon.  I still have fond (insert irony) memories of being stunned into a stupor with all the terms I was getting zapped with.  Fear not, yours truly is here to guide through the maze or at the very least, I can finally figure out what NEPA stands for.

Saginaw, Michigan
en.wikipedia.org
 Adaptive Reuse: think of it as a form of recycling.  Specifically, adaptive reuse is the "Process of reusing an old building or site for a purpose other than which it was originally built or design for."  Downtown loft developments are a perfect example of this process.  They usually involving taking former commercial or industrial buildings and converting them into residential and/or mixed-use spaces.

Comprehensive Plan: this is the official plan adopted by municipalities in order to guide the decision-making for potential public and private actions that impact community development.

Enabling Law: this is law, enacted by a state government, which establishes the boundaries for the actions of municipal governments.  It's an authoritative source for promulgating local historic preservation ordinances.  Maybe it's me but I think of an Enabling Law as an elastic guideline.

Environmental Assessment or Impact Statement (EA or EIA): an EA or EIA is a "Document prepared by a state or federal agency to establish compliance with obligations under federal or state environmental protection laws to consider the impact of proposed actions on the environment including historic resources."  In California, we have the California Environmental Quality Act which requires an Environmental Impact Report for all new major construction.  The EIR process has been used in the past as a cudgel by individuals who, for no other reason, abuse the process in order to make point.  It has also be abused by developers trying to ramrod their project through the approval process.  Regardless, environmental protection laws are there for a reason not someone's convenience.

Verandah House
Corinth, Mississippi
civilwartraveler.com
Landmark: this is a word used quite frequently by preservation enthusiasts.  A Landmark is "A site or structure designated by a local preservation ordinance or other law to be worthy of preservation because of its particular historic, architectural, archeological, or cultural significance."  The basis for what can be deemed Landmark-worthy is a set of criteria established by state historic preservation laws, adapted from federal laws.  So, no, the house you grew up in is probably not eligible for Landmark status, unless you grew up in the White House.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): "Primary federal laws requiring consideration of potential impacts of major actions on the environment, including historic and cultural resources."  Fairly straight forward

National Historic Landmark (NHL): this acronym had the distinction of being the first preservation-relation joke I cracked.  Me (during class on a random Thursday evening): NHL stand for National Historic Landmark not National Hockey League.  Professor loving it, rest of the class not getting it. It actually is defined as, "Property included in the National Register of Historic Places that has been judged by the Secretary of Interior to have 'national significance in American history, archeology, architecture, engineering and culture.'"

Post card of Penn Station
New York City, New York
en.wikipedia.org
National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA): signed into law in 1966 by then-President Lyndon B. Johnson, the NHPA is "federal law that encourages the preservation of cultural and historic in the United States."  Here's an interesting piece of irony, during the post-World War II occupation of Japan, the Japanese based "Monuments Men" were very active in the creation of the 1950 Cultural Properties Protection Law.  Their goal was to encourage the Japanese people to value and protect their cultural heritage, even though Japan had a history of enacting Cultural Property Protection laws since 1871.

National Register of Historic Places: "Official inventory of 'districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture."  Again, fairly straight forward.

Precedent: this a legal term which refers to "A prior case or decision similar or identical in fact or legal principle to the matter at hand that provides authority for resolution in a similar or identical way." Again, very straight forward.

I'll be honest, there are times when historic preservation can seem like nothing more than a tsunami of legal and technical jargon.  However, thanks to the tool kits and tips provided by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, getting a place designated a Landmark does not not have to be so daunting.  If you would like to find out how you can get a place in your community designated, you can go to http://www.preservationnation.org.  If you are outside the United States, the nice people at the Trust may be able to provide with links to your country's historic preservation organizations.

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

The Case for Brutalism

http://www.theawl.com/2014/06/brutalism-bullies



Robin Williams
photograph by Samerry
star-portraits.com
Hello Everyone:

Before launching into today's post on Brutalism, I would like to take a moment to share some thoughts on the passing of Robin Williams.  Robin Williams was one of those rare gifted comedic actors who could also do dramatic roles with equal enthusiasm.  Like many people, I first got to Robin through the television series Mork and Mindy.  "Mork" was not just an all-knowing alien, he was also very child-like and mischievous.  For me, his roles in Good Morning Viet Nam, The Fisher King, Mrs. Doubtfire, and Good Will Hunting will always remain with me.  Behind the laugh until hurts comedy, Robin battled the twin demons of depression and addiction.  They are both insidious and mysterious physical, emotional, and spiritual diseases that can strike anyone.  Who knows why Robin, a man who had everything to live for,  could succumb to this evil.  What I do know is he is finally at rest.  The battle is over.  Therefore in Robin's memory, if you or someone you know is battling depression, addiction, or alcoholism, please get help.  Here are some links where you find help:

Mental illness http://www.nami.org
Drug dependency http://www.todayna.org
Alcoholism http://www.aa.org

Thank you Robin for the laughter you made this world a funnier place.  Now onto today's post.


Morris A. Mechanic Theater
Baltimore, Maryland
flickr.com

In late April of this year, the city of Baltimore approved a certificate of demolition for the Morris A. Mechanic Theater by John Johansen after a lengthy battle to save one of the most unique buildings in the city.  This nearly fifty year-old building was loved by those few who wholeheartedly embraced heavy-duty functionalist style.  In the interest of full disclosure, yours truly is not a big fan of Brutalism but I do value its place within the Modern movement continuum.  The city of Baltimore plans to raze the former theater and replace with a condominium development.

 Anthony Paletta's article, "Brutalism's Bullies," for The Awl uses the pending demolition of this building to highlight the fate of buildings from the recent past-the sixties and seventies.  Buildings, like the Mechanic Theater, have aged badly and have not earned the same type affection that buildings from early to mid-twentieth century have earned.  Brutalist buildings are not pretty or inspirational, at least not at first glance.  They represent an austere domineering remnant of a reactionist philosophy of a younger generation of architects to the lightness of post-World War II Modernism. This style was favored by governments and institutions who preferred function over flair.  Over the years, Brutalism has earned the enmity of those who wish to replace it with anything else but that.

Prentice Women's Hospital
Chicago, Illinois
chicagoarchitecture.infor
The last two years have been especially unkind to Brutalist buildings.  Of the five at-risk building in 2012, three are no longer standing.  It's been a particularly bad year for John Johansen, not only is his Mechanic Theater about to meet the wrecking ball but also his Mummers Theater in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma faces imminent destruction as soon as the ink on the certificate of demolition is dry.  The razing of Bertrand Goldberg's Prentice Women's Hospital in Chicago commenced last autumn after, insert irony, helpful developments such as Mayor Rahm Emanual's Chicago Tribune op-ed piece lauding its replacement as "progress." The Third Church of Christ Scientist in Washington D.C. was leveled in March and five of the buildings in Paul Rudolph's Shoreline Apartment complex in Buffalo, New York also have an appointment with a demolition crew.

Citing John Grindrod's introduction to  Concretopia: A Journey Around the Rebuilding of Postwar Britain:

There is an accepted narrative to the way we think about our postwar architectural legacy.  That narrative is somewhat akin to the plot of a superhero blockbuster: a team of supervillains-planners, architects, academic-have had their corrupt, megalomanic way with the country for 30 years.  Then, at long last, a band of unlikely heroes-a ragbag of poets, environmentalists, and good, honest citizens-rise up against this architectural Goliath and topple it in the name of Prince Charles.
Bully for Bonny Prince Charles.


Orange County Government Center
Goshen, New York
archdaily.com
Sad to say that this is the way the majority of architecture critics perceive Brutalism today. Those who wish to save this part of Modernism's legacy are not just fighting a wall of indifference, they are locked in combat with Brutalism's sworn enemies who would gladly take turns with the wrecking ball.  These Brutalist arch nemeses liken those who have sympathies for this style as punks, contrarians with no sense of taste, deliberately in opposition to all that is good taste.  These self-appointed arbiters of good taste see battle lines being drawn, on one side are the traditionalists and on other side are the lower-case modernists and said modernists are now conveniently jumping on the Brutalist bandwagon.  Citing Rod Dreher in american Conservative, 

It is ironic that Modernists, who based their entire movement on liberation from tradition, are in a position of making traditionalist(ish) arguments for saving their hideous buildings from the wrecking ball.

Interesting point but let me point out that once upon a time their were critics who considered the work of the early Modernists hideous and now champion them.  What goes around comes around.

Peavy Plaza
Minneapolis, Minnesota
nytimes.com
Therefore, the task before preservation minded people is safe guarding a dying species of architecture that is endanger of being wiped off the map.  Citing A Next American City article that optimistically wished, Prentice Hospital Could Become Modernism's Penn Station Moment, no, it hasn't.  Strangely, as Brutalism is dying off in the real world, it continues to flourish in publication.

   Anthony Paletta uses the example of interest in the work of Paul Rudolph, whose work has frequently been a target of demolition.  Mr. Rudolph's work is the subject of an upcoming Yale University Press Volume by Timothy Rohan's The Architecture of Paul Rudolph and Chris Mottalini's After You Left/They Took it Apart pays tribute to the architect's lost homes-also the subject of a traveling exhibit. The print-only architecture magazine Clog published a 2013 issue dedicated to Brutalism.  John Grindrod's Concretetopia and Owen Hatherly's Militant Modernism and A New Guide to the Ruins of Great Britain have stake their ground in defense of the value and design quality of Brutalist construction in the United Kingdom.  These publications and the valiant efforts of local and national preservationists have generated success: the landmarking of Paul Friedburg's Peavy Plaza, Marcel Breuer and Robert Gatje's Broward County Main Library, and Paul Rudolph's Orange County Government Center.  The latter being the subject of an oddly irrelevant proposal by New York hotel designer Gene Kaufman to buy it for an undisclosed personal use.

Broward County Main Library
Broward County, Florida
broward.org
As deep as the vehemence toward Brutalism runs, a 2012 New York Times "Room for Debate" article on the subject by Anthony Daniels demanded "Atrocities Should be Eliminated."  Mr. Daniels argued that profit, not visceral emotion, is typically the biggest threat to the style's longevity.  Further, most developers' logic for determining if a building is disposable or not is based on whether or not they can own it and build something bigger on the site. This is a threat to architecture in general, especially to styles that the public doesn't value.  Let's put this way, if the New York Real Estate Board could argue straight faced that not a single iota of Manhattan's Midtown East, largely composed of pre-war structures, deserved designation then what hope is there for the Morris A. Mechanic Theater in Baltimore?

Mummers Theater
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
blog.archpaper.com
Fortunately, there have been moments when the sheer presence of Brutalist buildings has been a boom for the style, as in the case of government and institutional structures, where the programmatic elements of new buildings do not differ that much.  Also, demolition and new construction are less cost effective than renovation.  Such is the case with the Orange County Government Center, where renovation proved to be a more cost efficient approach than demolition.

Perhaps, the even greater threat to Brutalist buildings is the association with urban decay. The United States does not have nearly the same inventory of residential Brutalist stock as in Europe, what it does have: government, educational, and institutional structure, suffers from lack of maintenance across the board.  Images of an abandoned and run-down Mechanic Theater or Mummers Theater is even worse in Europe where said buildings would be linked to the vast legacies of low-income residential construction dystopia.

University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth
massachusetts.edu
Anthony Paletta rightly points out that even the en vogue midcentury modern design did always feel a good deal of love.  While some of its totems, Ludwig Mies Van der Rohe and the Eames Chair, never age, most of modernism did not merit a second glance.  The television series Mad Men has proven quite useful for show casing production design affected by Skidmore, Owings, and Merrill's work from the sixties presented as new not as a hodge podge renovation broken up by ductwork or electric cable.  The point is while mid-century architecture has enjoyed a renaissance thanks to Mad Men and Matthew Weiner's meticulous attention to detail, do not discount a renaissance of Brutalism.  It could happen in this century.

Boston City Hall Plaza
Boston, Massachusetts
en.wikipedia.org
Of course, none of this wistfulness can disregard the fact that Brutalist structures often come with real problems.  Upkeep can be very expensive due to design issues.  For example, the Orange County Government Center has eighty-seven different roofs and the The Third Church of Christ Scientist requires a serious amount of scaffolding just to change a light bulb.  In most cases, the Brutalist concept of spatial arrangement has put urban street life  in a choke hold. An example of this is the Mechanic Theater, whose main entrance faced a mid-block plaza while ignoring an adjacent thoroughfare.  In some cases, the buildings are laid out in such a way, as in Boston's City Hall Plaza, that directly frustrates any meaningful attempt to engage pedestrians.  This alone can make the case for calling out the demolition crew and replacing them.  City Hall Plaza, as totalitarian as it may seem, has not destroyed the dense surrounding streets directly to the south.  Rather, it just sucks all the life out of the area.  Let's put it this way, if you can fit the entire Barum and Bailey Circus in it, it's too big.

Art and Architecture Building
Yale University New Haven, Connecticut
bluffton.edu
Brutalist buildings did contain some humanizing touches that have long been removed or forgotten.  Citing Timothy Rohan's Paul Rudolph monograph, Mr. Rohan outlines some of the more fanciful details at the University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth:

Carefully chosen, brightly colored textiles and carpeting acted as vibrant, stimulating fall to the omnipresent, grey concrete...[t]hey choose to upholster the common room banquettes in orange and carpet the floor with a pattern of orange, red, and purple stripes.  The banded carpets echoed the raised ridges of the concrete block and the striations on the poured-in-place structural beams and balconies.

This sense of humanity guided the recent renovation of the library building at the university giving it light, color, and openness to the space.  The addition of glass altered the original design, demonstrated how variation and revival of existing Brutalist architecture is possible.  Robert A.M. Stern followed the route for his renovation of Paul Rudolph's Art and Architecture Building at Yale University.  The Alley Theater in Houston, Texas has also undergone a similar renovation.  At a 2013 Clog panel on Brutalism, Jack Johansen''s son noted his late father's response to the possible razing of the Mechanic Theater and what could be altered to accommodate criticism.  However, the architect passed away in 2012 and it is all wishful thinking now.  Brutalism has undergone similar revivals in the United Kingdom, which as the distinction of having the most examples of deteriorating structures.  Some revival examples include the Barbican Estate which has undergone some serious renovations and Erno Goldfinger's Balfron Tower is currently undergoing renovation which may be prove to be successful.

A preservation galvanizing moment a la Penn Station would be a fantastic boost for Brutalism but given the strong feelings for and against, the lack of a iconic building, it is unlikely that there will be a great need for Brutalism any time soon.  Still, it may continue to live in the history books.

Monday, August 11, 2014

The Questions We Need To Ask

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/green





Pine-Pike Seattle, Washington
downtownseattle.com
Hello Everyone:

A good Monday to you all.  Yours truly is back from a nice weekend that me twisting and shouting to the Beatles.  I want to say hi to Nutmeg UK.  One more thing before I get started, I checked the analytics this morning and it looks like we're on the fast track to reach 15,000 page views.  Keep up the great job.  Now onto to today's topic, "Ten Questions We Should Asking About Our Communities" by F. Kaid Benfield for The Huffington Post July 8, 2014.

"Smart growth."  What does this much bandied about term mean?  How does a community grow smartly?  For the about the last twenty years, Mr. Benfield has spent a good deal of time working on an agenda founded on this concept.  For lack of any thing better, "smart growth" describes an idea which states, "...our regions must replace suburban sprawl with compact forms of growth; that neighborhoods must be walkable and convenient; that automobile dependence must be replace with a system of mobility choices in which the automobile is on a part."  It's an environmentalist's agenda and those who promote it, believe it's ideal for people.

Tyson's Corner, Virginia
novaproperties4sale.com
When it was introduced in the nineties, smart growth was a somewhat radical idea and there are still places today where it's not accepted or fully implemented.  However, advocates can find a small measure of comfort in the fact that smart growth has gone mainstream, part of the curriculum of every planning school (including the one yours truly breezed through) and guiding urban thought far and wide.  It's an ongoing process, but the good news is that migration from urban centers have ceased, sprawl is decreasing, and big cities across the United States are thinking about mass transit.  This is nice to hear.

Yet, Mr. Benfield is increasingly convinced that smart growth and smart transportation, as necessary as they are for the future of our communities, are not nearly enough to create sustainable communities.  They are not sufficient enough to go beyond sustainability, as we should, toward social equality and justice, to places that repair and restore the damage already done, to places or healing, nourishment, and resiliences.

House in Hyde Park
Chicago, Illinois
findingdulcinea.com

Further, there have been advances in research and methodology, particularly, in green infrastructure and green building, that have arisen since the smart growth plan was developed.  This movement has never been fully integrated and that's a shame because, as Mr. Benfield observes, "new development that doesn't take advantage of these practices isn't 'smart'; it's dumb."  In his book People Habitat, F. Kaid Benfield argues that smart growth will become a thing of the past if isn't allowed to evolve.  Therefore, Mr. Benfield proposes a more ambitious and holistic approach.  In the interest of starting a conversation, Mr. Benfield suggests a list of ten questions we ask in order to find ways to improve.  These questions encompass smart growth and more.  They are:

Park in Boston's Chinatown
Boston, Massachusetts
boston.com

1. Are neighborhoods fully hospitable to residents with a range of incomes, ages, and abilities?

Good question because in all the discussions about smart growth, this is the one area where the subject is deficient.  Gentrification is a difficult topic to deal with but it does not make it less vexing, in fact Mr. Benfield declares it the most important.  In a shameless plug for his book, "if our solutions don't work for people, they will never work for the planet.

2. Does the community respect nature, integrating natural areas and systems into regional planning and neighborhood design?

F. Kaid Benfield declares this to be another weakness of smart growth. In the enthusiasm for landscape urbanism and downtown infill, smart growth has frequently ignored our need for actual nature.  This does not necessarily mean we should all be living in forests, rather, it implies a careful and considerate integration of nature into our cities.  The operative words are careful and considerate if we want our cities to be the living ecosystem that someone wants to live in.

Providence, Rhode Island
en.wikipedia.org
3. Do buildings and infrastructure take advantage of resource-efficient design and management practices?

Green buildings are common and green infrastructure is making head way.  So much so, that some progressive institutions believe that now is the time to install "net-positive" buildings that create more sustainable energy and water than they consume in order to reduce wast.  Until then, we should ask if our current buildings are headed down the right path regarding consumption and pollution reduction.

4. Do the community design and social structure encourage healthy and well-being?


Mr, Benfield notes that this is another big issue which can lead to further discussions on whether there is clean air and water, shops within walking range, nearby amenities and services such as parks and recreational facilities.

5. Is the overall metropolitan or community development footprint discernible and no larger than necessary?

Is there policy in place to limit the encroachment of new development onto open space?  Mr. Benfield suggests that leapfrog development should be discouraged through appropriate policy and incentives.

Vignettes of Buffalo, New York
answers.com
6. Does the community include public spaces of beauty, character, and utility?

"Beauty" and "character" can be hard to define but it is important to ask this question and try to answer it.  Public spaces give our neighborhoods and cities definition.  They include: parks, plazas, monuments, and our most plentiful and important public spaces-our streets.  To they serve the users well?  Are they at a pleasing and harmonious scale?  Are they attractive?

7. Are there convenient, safe, affordable, and efficient transportation choices?

This is a critical factor, residents should have transit options.  In communities of varied scale, public transit options absolutely must be convenient, safe, affordable, and efficient.  The stops and stations must be attractive and well-lit.  There should also be accommodations for bicyclists, pedestrians, and people with disabilities.  Many cities are currently playing host to car- and bike-share programs: would your community make a good candidate?

8. Does new development use land efficiently with appropriate attention to the context?

One of the biggest mistakes planners and developers made was allowing horribly inefficient land use that characterized suburban sprawl in the late twentieth century.  This cannot be repeated.  However, this question comes with a polarity, theoretically, the highest density the market will allow on a specific site will result in the most efficient use of land; however, sensitivity to context may dictate something less than the highest and best use of land.  This is a good thing, albeit a painful process but within reason.  Mr. Benfield states, "I believe it is entirely appropriate for the community (not just the immediate neighborhood, importantly though their view should be given extra weight) to decide where the balance is struck in each case."

Hollygrove Indoor Market
Upton New Orleans, Louisiana
lsuagcenter.com
9. Does the community respect and enhance important local conditions, resources, and culture?

Places like Dubai and Las Vegas are really hard to consider-rapidly growing high water consumption desert metropolises.  At the opposite end are places that built on floodplains, given rising sea levels and ever stronger storms. Thus local climate is a determinate as is local culture including historic resources.  A great community will celebrate its cultural assets.

10. Does the community encourage collaboration in planning and development?

Easy to do in theory and hard to put into practice but very necessary.  Decisions have a better chance of success when it is the result of a collaborative process.

These are just a few of the questions we should be asking our communities with regards to the future. They cannot be answered neatly but they foster healthy constructive discussions of which direction our communities should take and what are its values.

*if you click on the link I provided for you at the top of the post you should be directed to the full article which has many great links to F. Kaid Benfield's sources.

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Uncovering Women's History Sites

http://blog.preservationleadershipforum.org/2014/21/women-history-sites/#.U9aBfP1dWgs




The Modjeska M. Simkins House
Columbia, South Carolina
nps.gov
Hello Everyone:

Women's history been relegated to the margins of general history. However, how many of you can name a site of women's history? I'm pretty sure the answer is none, except, maybe places of famous women like Susan B. Anthony.  The challenge of finding sites of women's history is posed by Karen Nickless in a recent post for the Preservation Leadership Forum titled, "Find the Women: Where Are the Women's History Sites."  Some places, such as the textile mill in Lowell, Massachusetts where women made their presence known in the workplace, are easy to find.  Others, not so much but they're out there waiting to be discovered and brought into the light of day.

Historic Textile Mill
Lowell, Massachusetts
nps.gov
 The first challenge is locating these places.  If    you drive around your community looking for  women-centric sites, you'll have a difficult time  identifying them from looking through your  windshield.  The example of the textile factory  in Lowell is not a particularly female-oriented  site because men were employed there as well.  Houses where significant (not famous) women  lived look identical to the other houses in the  neighborhood.  Women's sites hide in plain  sight.  Most often, you'll only learn about them  through archival research or oral history.


Pond Farm
Russian River Valley, California
Home and studio of Marguerite Wildenhain
savingplaces.org
 The House of Modjeska Monteith Simkins in  Columbia, South Carolina is another example    of hidden women's history.  Modjeska  Monteith Simkins was in Columbia, South  Carolina.  Ms. Simkins was a leader in African  American public health.  In 1931, Ms. Simkins  entered the public health profession as the  Director of Negro Work for the South Carolina  Tuberculosis.  In 1942, Ms. Simkins lost her postion with the Tuberculosis Association because of her increased involvement with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.  As secretary of the NAACP, Ms. Simkins worked with the state of South Briggs v. Elliot case with the South Carolina federal court, regarding the equalization of Clarendon County Schools.

Cigar Factory
Charleston, South Carolina
en.wikipedia.org 
A cigar factory is not the first place you'd think of when looking for historical sites but the Cigar Factory in Charleston is another women's history site.  The factory was the site of a significant strike in 1945, it was only later that historians began to understand it as a women's site.  The majority of the strikers were African American women who introduced the twentieth century hymn "We Shall Overcome" to the Civil Rights movement.

One of the core values of the National Trust is diversity.  This value is applied when the Trust chooses its National Treasures.  The Trust believes that National Treasures should always reflect the past of all American so that the entire breadth of the American experience, in a constant state of change, reflects the combined narrative of all of the facet of our history.  Although every National Treasure site can be viewed as a women's site, Karen Nickless gives two noteworthy examples:

Pond Farm guest house
Russian River Valley, California
Home and studio of Marguerite Wildenhain
savingplaces.org
The Pond Farm in the Russian River Valley in Northern California.  This was the home and studio of American ceramic artist Marguerite Wildenhain.  Marguerite Wildenhain (neé Friedlaender) was a French-born ceramicist who studied at the Bauhaus.  Both she and her husband, Franz Wildenhain, emigrated to the United States in 1933 after the National Socialists came to power. In the United States, Ms. Wildenhain she taught at the Oakland School of Arts and Crafts, the Appalachian Institute, and Black Mountain College.  She also published three books: Pottery: Form and Expression; The Invisible Core: A Potter's Life and Thoughts and That We Look and See: An Admirer Looks at the Indians.  Pond Farm is currently a California State Park, however it is currently under threat of  neglect and lack of funding

Villa Lewaro
Irvington, New York
en.wikipedia.org
Our second example is Villa Lewaro in Irvington, New York.  This palatial home is also known as the residence of Anne E. Poth but is best known as the home of Madam C.J. Walker between 1918 and 1919.  Madam C.J. Walker is believed to be the first self-made African American female millionaire who made her fortune from a successful line of hair and beauty products for African American women.  The house was built in the Italian Renaissance style by Vertner Tandy.  The name Villa Lewaro was coined by the singer Enrico Caruso and is a combination of the first two letters of Madam Walker daughter's name Lelia Walker Robinson.

The National Trust for Historic Preservation is actively looking for other sites of women-centric history.  To this end, the Trust has joined forces with the National Collaboration for Women's History sites to identify, save, and educate the public about American women's history.  This collaboration will include evaluating and nominating historic sites that are possible National Treasures and National Historic Landmarks as well as working to raise awareness of preservation of these sites.  The NCHWS as a long history of locating women's sites, publishing guides and interpreting these sites.  Their expertise, along with the Trust, will most definitely enrich the breadth and depth of American history.  You can join the "treasure hunt" and who knows, you could uncover a long lost gem.

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

Saving Our Historic Places From Natural Disaster

http://blog.preservationnation.org/2014/06/26/deep-water-three-ways-save-historic-climate-threats/#.U7BfZMp5v5Z



Moving the Cape Hatteras Lighthouse
Cape Hatteras, North Carolina
pmc-controls.com
Hello Everyone:

Before I get going, I want to send a shout up to Nutmeg in the United Kingdom.  Miss you.

The weather, it's something we all can talk about without getting into a big argument.  However, the weather, frequently intense weather events from flooding in the South and East to persistent drought in the West, pose a real danger to historic resources.  These meteorological events are not something unique to the United States, intense meteorological events occur around the world and impact historic resources everywhere.  In a recent blog post for the PreservationNation Blog,  senior Preservation Green Lab director Mark Huppert looks at "...Three Ways to Save Historic Places from Climate."

Weather satellite image of the American Midwest
post-gazette.com
On May 20, 2014 the Union of Concerned Scientists released a report identifying thirty at risk historic sites around the United States.  (http://www.ucusa.org)  Adam Markham, director of climate impacts and co-author of the report said, "The imminent risk to these sites and the artifacts they contain threaten to pull apart the quilt that tells the story the nation's heritage and history." (Ibid)  The report clearly demonstrates the urgency and scale of the challenges, posing important questions for the preservation profession:

What responsibility do we preservationists have in the face of threats from natural disasters?

If we do hold ourselves responsible for finding solutions, what can we individually do about a challenge that seems so big?

Jamestown settlement
currently under threat from rising seas
en.wikipedia.org
 If you think the answer is yes to the first  question, then you're not alone.  The National  Trust for Historic Preservation has be working  to find answers for the above questions for  nearly a decade.  What they do know is that  persistent climate risks represent some of the  biggest challenges ahead because there might    not be sufficient funding or political incentive    save historic resources.  At the conclusion of  the UCS report, Mr. Markham writes,

In addition, Congress should fund President Obama's proposed Climate Resilience Fund, which could be used to help municipalities and businesses become more resilient to climate change. (Ibid)

Angela Anderson, director of the Climate and Energy Program adds,

The fund could also be used to help protect and preserve the nation's iconic and historical landmarks and irreplaceable archeological treasures that are being destroyed by sea level rise, wildfire and flooding.

You can help make a difference and protect the places in your part of the world that might be lost forever.  Here are the solutions.

Downtown Annapolis, Maryland
under threat of storm surge flooding
ian.umces.edu
Address the worst case scenario head on

Having a solid plan in place is the best way to deal with the worst possible outcome.  For example, in Annapolis, Maryland a small but passionate group of people made a real difference in the way the city will respond to their worst case scenario-storm surge flooding.  A large group of stakeholders, including preservationists, are creating an amendment to Annapolis's previously adopted Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan using FEMA's 'How-To Guide #6 (FEMA 386-6) Integrating Historic Property and Cultural Resource Considerations into Hazard Mitigation Planning(http://www.fema.gov)

Annapolis and its historic downtown rely on a significant amount of heritage tourism which, undoubtably would be lost or interrupted in the event of a major flood, as in 2003 when it was hit by Hurricane Isabel, this amendment is a way for preservationists to protect historic resources and reinforce economic resiliency in case of natural disaster.  Having a solid natural disaster mitigation plan place is a necessary requirement for cities that hope to qualify for FEMA funds and this amendment process ensures that historic preservation strategies are taken into considerations when protecting or rebuilding a city from a natural disaster.

Statue of Liberty during Hurricane Sandy
Sandy Nadine DeNinno
ibtimes.com
Play Strong Defense

A strong offense is a strong defense.  When it comes to protecting historic resources from natural disasters, you need a very good defense. This was, indeed, quite true in New York City following the devastating Hurricane Sandy.  New York City recently adopted building code intended to protect people, property, and places against the next super storm.

From all the buildings deemed unsafe or uninhabitable by the NYC Building Department in Sandy's aftermath, a staggering 89% were one- and two-story wood frames buildings constructed before 1961.  This demonstrated the vulnerability of historic homes and small commercial buildings to catastrophic weather events.  To strengthen the city and older building's resiliency in the future, the new code requires such things as a flood-resistant first floor construction or raise the first floor above mean flood elevation.  On the surface, the new code may seem at odds with historic preservation, doing nothing is even worse.  To put it bluntly, once a precious historic resource is lost, it's lost forever and putting in place building code that will improve long-term resiliency is a small price to pay.

The Farnsworth House (1951)
Ludwig Mies Van der Rohe
Plano, Illinois
farnsworthhouse.org
When all else fails, get out of harm's way

Duck and cover, generally sane advice in many situations except when it comes to buildings. You can't pick up a historic building or site and move it when there's a severe weather condition on the way.  Relocation or elevation are not the preservationists' preferred method of protecting resource, sometimes it's the best choice for protecting a resource from persistent or imminent damage.  This was the case at the Farnsworth built by Ludwig Mies Van der Rohe in 1951 and located near the Fox River in Plano, Illinois.

This house is one of the most loved Modernist masterpieces, however, due to increased urbanization, storm water runoff, and rising water from the Fox River, the house has been repeatedly inundated since the day it was built, threatening the integrity of the house and its unique character.  In response the NTHP assemble a panel of experts to come up with solutions to this recurring problem. The panel, Farnsworth House Flood Mitigation Project's website (http://www.farnsworthproject.org) outlines three possible remedies for protecting the house: raising it in situ. relocating the house, or hydraulic lifts.  Of the three alternative, using hydraulic lifts proved to be the best possible solution because it preserved the building's connection to the site. Nevertheless, raising or relocating the house still remain viable options.  A final decision is still pending based on technical and cost feasibility.  Either way, the use of hydraulic lifts at the Farnsworth House is aiding NTHP to understand that action has to be taken immediately or risk losing valuable historic documents.

Historic buildings, sites, and artifacts are more than just places and things.  They are documents of who we are as culture at any given moment in history.  People come and go but places and artifacts remain. Whether the loss is through natural or man-made disaster, it is an irretrievable loss.  Only through proper planning can we make sure that our national treasures remain available for future generations.

Follow me on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/glamavon and on Pinterest http://www.pinterest.com/glamtroy

Instagram- find me at hpblogger




Monday, August 4, 2014

Is The Great Streets Program A Great Idea?

http://www.latimes.com/la-me-adv-great-streets-201407027-story.html#page=1



Interstate 110, Southbound Harbor Freeway
flickr.com

Hello Everyone:

Finally the oppressive heat and humidity has tapered off and yours truly doesn't feel so miserable anymore.  Now, I can fully devote my time attention to all things architecture, historic preservation, urban planning and design.

Today's topic is acupuncture.  Specifically, 'urban acupuncture.'  In a recent article by David Zahniser, Matt Stevens, and Laura J. Nelson in the Los Angeles Times titled, "Mayor sets out to transform L.A. streets through 'urban acupuncture,'" our reporters take a look at Mayor Eric Garcetti's plans to transform Gaffey Street in San Pedro and fourteen other rather nondescript looking streets throughout the city and county into places of urban activity.  The mayor describes this process as 'urban acupuncture' with plans to add bicycle racks, plazas, crosswalk upgrades, and assorted amenities all designed to draw pedestrians to otherwise desolate stretches of streets and attract new businesses.  It's a nice idea and if properly implemented, it could make these places with automobile-centric businesses into very lovely places to spend time.

Mini-mall at 312 North Gaffey Street
San Pedro, California
loopnet.com
Los Angeles is best known for its wide and all too frequently mind numbingly traffic jammed boulevards that criss-cross the urban landscape more intended to get people from one end of the city to the other than for creating some version of street life and community. Mayor Garcetti's "Great Streets" initiative hopes to remedy this situation.  The initiative, which has been met with both excitement and skepticism from the targeted communities.  "Twenty years ago, a street was a place that moved cars.  You moved through it, and there were very few people who conceptualized a street any other way," says USC Price School of Public Policy urban planning professor Marlon Boarnet.  If put into motion, the "Great Streets" initiative (http://www.lamayor.org) would create streets that people "would want to go to and spend time at, as opposed to places you just want to move through."

It sounds like a fantastic idea, make some of the more dodgy stretches of boulevard in and around Los Angeles more attractive and pedestrian oriented but behind all this sunshine is a hard calculus: the city lacks both money and the space to add the alternative solutions needed to significantly reduce traffic congestion: widening the streets and costly mass transit.  Therefore, the good mayor is pursuing a a reverse strategy: bring the amenities to the targeted communities so that the residents don't have to travel and hopefully, not use their car.  That sounds pretty steep for some of the residents, whose biggest concern is anything that'll make traffic more worse than it is already.

Car driving along Gaffey Street
San Pedro, California
loopnet.com
Back in the City of San Pedro, many of the locals, still irritated over the decision to add bicycle lanes to some of the major streets, really aren't in the mood for anything that will create more congestion along Gaffey Street, according to Doug Epperhart, former president of the Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council.  Mr. Epperhart said, "Their attitude is 'Anything that will slow my progress to and from the freeway, I'm not interested in.'"  It's not the first time City Hall has tried to upgrade these mix and mismatched boulevards.  If history is any indicator, building a village on a street is easier said than done.  During the nineties, then-Mayor Richard Riordan implemented the Target Neighborhood Initiative, which awarded federal funds to a dozen business districts including the portion of Sunset Boulevard in Echo Park and Central Avenue in South Los Angeles.  The intention was to create a Main Street atmosphere, with trees, murals, streetlights, and help business owners pretty up their storefronts.  The improvements did not always translated into increase revenue, one of key goals of the program, according to Con Howe, the director of Los Angeles City Planning, 1992-2005.  Mr. Howe resigned himself to the fact that some neighborhoods "just had a lot more challenges than others."

Sunset Boulevard in Silver Lake, Los Angeles
Photograph by Michael L. Jiroch
panaramio.com
Mayor Eric Garcetti wants to create more favorable conditions for transformation by zeroing in on sites that already have green shoots of economic activity.  Ever the political campaigner, the mayor is quick to highlight the success in the Thirteen Council District he represented prior to becoming mayor.  For example, in the Silver Lake area, he close one block next to the Sunset Boulevard business district to automobile traffic and replaces with a green-polka dot plaza.  In the Atwater Village community, then Council Member Garcetti worked to make Glendale Boulevard-a major feeder to the 5 Freeway-more hospitable to pedestrians. City work crews upgraded the crosswalks, extending the curbs further into the street, added landscape elements and trash cans.  It sounds more like cosmetic, rather than substantive improvements but, the mayor touts the fact that these small improvements led to the arrival of new restaurants and retail establishments.

Larchmont Boulevard
Los Angeles, Ca
en.wikipedia.org
Los Angeles' commercial boulevards were built many decades ago along, some now-abandoned trolley lines.  As demographics shifted toward the suburbs and the streetcars gave way to the car, developers began to focus less on pedestrian traffic and cater more to the car, says Matt Roth historian for the Automobile Club of Southern California.  As mini-malls became more common in the seventies and eighties, long blocks of street-facing storefronts became less and less.  Some, like sections of Melrose Avenue, Larchmont Boulevard, Robertson Boulevard retained some semblance of a street life, others did not.  However, long dormant sidewalk-oriented districts are awakening.  For example, once sleepy York Boulevard in Highland Park, a community north of Downtown Los Angeles, has become a vibrant place that
El Huaraches Azteca
York Boulevard in Highland Park, California
losangeles.grubstreet.com
caters to an array of middle and upper-class desires: coffee, comic books, vegan ice cream, and over priced donut.  Abbot Kinney Boulevard in Venice has become a commercial and retail destination that rivals Rodeo Drive. The Great Street program cheerleaders have their collective fingers crossed for similar good results.

Chapman University urban studies fellow Joel Kotkin calls the mayor's initiative a "good idea in principle."  Nevertheless, he argues that the local economy is the most important factor in improving the streetscape.  Mr. Kotkin says, "Designating a nice couple of blocks in the middle of poverty is not a great accomplishment...if you don't have growth, I don't know how you sustain this over time."  No truer sentiment.

Pico Boulevard between Hauser Boulevard and Fairfax Avenue
blog.archpaper.com
Several streets, in each of the fifteen council districts, selected by Mayor Garcetti have already become the beneficiaries of investment.  For a complete list please go to http://www.latimes.com/.../la-me--in-great-streets-announcement-20140602-story....  In West Los Angeles, the mayor has targeted four blocks of Westwood Boulevard, bordered on the north by the Geffen Playhouse and on the south by the UCLA Hammer Museum.  In his former council district, the mayor chose a section of Hollywood Boulevard already packed with tourists.  I'm not sure that this was a good choice because there are sections on the eastern side of the famed boulevard that could, perhaps, benefit from some attention.  In my part of Los Angeles, the Mid-City area, a ten-block segment of Pico Boulevard has a small number of restaurants that offer outdoor dining favored by the mayor.  On Figueroa Street, running through Highland Park, gyms, a record store, vintage clothing store, and the restaurant Kitchen Mouse have joined the check-cashing businesses and pupuserias.

Van Nuys Boulevard in the City of Pacoima
flickriver.com 
In the City of Pacoima, California, residents are skeptical about the prospects for Van Nuys Boulevard, another street targeted for 'urban acupuncture.'  This section of the boulevard, which features gorgeous murals of Mona Lisa and the actor Danny Trejo, offers much of the basics: a barber shop, dentist office, taco stand, and a market.  The residents have suggested a number of ways to improve the street: a park, rubbish cans, benches, some shaded areas.  "It's nice that everything is close by, but that doesn't it's nice," says Alejandra Morales Sanchez.  Van Nuys may seem like a great remove from Hollywood, Westwood, or any of the other streets included in Mayor Eric Garcetti's program but they have one thing in common, they aren't living up to their potential as great streets.

Is the "Great Streets" program a great idea?  Hard to tell because the greatness of a street comes with time.  The Champs Elysees in Paris did not become the grand boulevard it is overnight.  What makes a street so great is the uniqueness of its character.  I see this in York Boulevard in Highland Park and I see the potential in Van Nuys Boulevard in Pacoima.  What these places need is strategic investments and tax credits for the existing businesses and a strong commitment to maintaining the character of the community.  What makes streets and communities great are their uniqueness and from that, robust economic activity will follow.

Follow me on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/glamavon and on Pinterest http://www.pinterest.com/glamtroy

Instagram- find me at hpblogger